Bond
is back. For the twenty-third time in fifty years, Eon productions, which started as a collaboration between the American Albert 'Cubby' Brocolli and Harry Saltzman, a Canadian, and which is now run by the heirs of Brocolli, have dreamed up another epic concoction of the
enduring espionage-thriller series starring British Secret Intelligence Service
agent James Bond, the mythic construction of English author Ian Fleming.
Fleming,
an operative for British Intelligence during the Second World War, dreamed up a
series of books which he would reveal were “written for warm-blooded
heterosexuals.”
With
a globe-travelling hero constantly enmeshed in life-or-death intrigue amid a
procession of alluring and sensual female companions, and who pitted wits
against an assortment of ferocious villains working for ideologically hostile foreign
governments, the books portrayed a hero decidedly more worldy in scope than the
famous heroes created by Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, John Buchan and Herman Cyril
McNeile.
Bond
certainly projected a more glamour-tinged edge and a level of escapism which
represented a clear departure from past characterisations of the British super
sleuth.
The
context of the origins of the Bond phenomenon are worth noting. The end of the
Second World War marked the beginning of the end of the British Empire, a
period in which the contracting imperial body politic was mirrored by a waning
influence on a world stage now dominated by the cold warring United States and
Soviet Union.
Yet
Bond, the master problem-solver and the public school-populated but tenaciously
game British secret service, kept the crumbling empire relevant.
The backdrop of the humiliation of the Suez Crisis notwithstanding, Bond foils the ambitions of Doctor No, the Soviet asset who is sabotaging American missile tests at Cape Canaveral, and in From Russia, With Love, the debacle of the defected Burgess and Maclean is glossed over by an understanding on the Soviet side that its most feared counter intelligence agency, SMERSH, considers Bond and the British secret service their most formidable foes in the conduct of the brutal business of international espionage.
The backdrop of the humiliation of the Suez Crisis notwithstanding, Bond foils the ambitions of Doctor No, the Soviet asset who is sabotaging American missile tests at Cape Canaveral, and in From Russia, With Love, the debacle of the defected Burgess and Maclean is glossed over by an understanding on the Soviet side that its most feared counter intelligence agency, SMERSH, considers Bond and the British secret service their most formidable foes in the conduct of the brutal business of international espionage.
Thus
it was in the context of the austerity-laden fifties and the Cold War that
Fleming’s brain-child became colossal best-sellers; paving the way for the
movies that would find a cinematic niche in the 1960s.
The
Bond films, inaugurated with Scottish actor, Sean Connery in the lead role were
nothing short of a cultural phenomenon. The movies were replete with beautiful
female leads, exotic location backdrops, technology-savvy gadgets, thrilling car
chases, and popular, velvety title songs which captured the public imagination.
It
led to a host of imitators, none of which survived. The Bond franchise went
from strength-to-strength finding new themes after the ending of the Cold War
while keeping many of its distinctive elements.
Some
of these central elements are for some tired features and expressions of an anachronistic
formula.
“Bond
is an imperialist and a misogynist who kills people and laughs about it, and
drinks Martinis and cracks jokes,” said Matt Damon, star of the Bourne
Identity series of movie thrillers.
But
Skyfall, featuring Daniel Craig in
his third outing as Bond, shows there is still much life left in the series.
Directed by Sam Mendes, the movie follows the established pattern of an
attention-grabbing opener, a heavily orchestrated cabaret-style theme tune sung
to stylized opening titles, intense fist fights, car chases and an
arch-criminal with whom Bond engages in a noisy duel to the death.
The
grotesqueness of Fleming’s villainous characters, invariably foreigners, almost
to a man deformed or depraved, and certainly vainglorious and amoral in the
extreme, was retained in the films and remains in the narrative of this movie.
The
villain of the piece is one Raoul Silva, a disgruntled former British agent played
by Spanish actor Javier Bardem who is bent on humiliating and destroying ‘M’,
the head of MI6, the British foreign intelligence service. Silva is a
resourceful enemy who utilises cyber-terrorism as a means of penetrating the inner
sanctum of MI6.
The
organisation is so thoroughly compromised that he literally sends it
underground to the subterranean labyrinth which functioned as Winston Churchill’s
war time bunker.
As
a leading man, Craig is decidedly cut from a cloth different to those who have
previously inhabited the role of Bond. His pug-ugly mug, crew cut hairstyle and
sinewy build remove any pretence of the traditional suave appearance of the
character and underline the fact that Bond is as much of a thug as the thugs he
pursues.
This
effect does not necessarily depart from the original depiction by Fleming whose
novels bore more than a hint of Bond’s inherent coldness, his ruthlessness and sadistic
tendencies.
In From Russia With Love, Bond can sort out
the gentleman assassin from the rest by studying the choice of meat used to
complement his brand of wine. One suspects that Craig’s character operates on
different instincts.
Bond
movies are about out and out action as well as about death, and here the
instruments of conflict are no less innovative than they were in succeeding
films in the series.
A ‘smart
gun’ with individualised palm-prints provides the latest incarnation of Bond’s perennial
Walther PPK, while others are armed at various points with Glock 18C pistols which
are loaded with depleted uranium and an assortment of high-powered assault
rifles and sub-machine guns. A colt rifle and a dagger, however, provide for more
down-to-earth weaponry.
In Skyfall, the villain truly brings the
fight back to the home front. While the movie has segments staged in far off
places such as Istanbul, Shanghai and Macau, much of the action is set in
London and ends at Bond’s family estate and childhood home in Scotland.
Is
Bond an anachronism as some are wont to assert? An answer need not dwell too
much on the intricate points of cultural critique and notions of political
correctitude. So long as movies can thrive on action, adventure and pure
escapism James Bond movies will belong to the times in which they are made.
(c)
Adeyinka Makinde (2012)
Adeyinka
Makinde is the author of JERSEY BOY: The
Life and Mob Slaying of Frankie DePaula
No comments:
Post a Comment